How Londoners could save hundreds by walking instead of Tube

Londoners could save money by walking some of the capital’s shortest Tube journeys <i>(Image: NQ Staff)</i>
Londoners could save money by walking some of the capital’s shortest Tube journeys (Image: NQ Staff)
This article is brought to you by our exclusive subscriber partnership with our sister title USA Today, and has been written by our American colleagues. It does not necessarily reflect the view of The Herald.

Londoners could save hundreds of pounds a year by walking some of the capital's shortest Tube journeys instead of travelling underground.

Cost of Tube Journeys

With the adult pay-as-you-go fare for a single Tube journey in Zone 1 at £2.80 using Oyster or contactless payment, a return trip immediately clocks up to £5.60.

For someone making the same trip five days a week, the cost rapidly accumulates to a weekly expenditure of £28.

Over a year, assuming 48 working weeks, this amounts to a hefty £1,344.

Walking for the Win

Walking, on the other hand, comes at no cost and burns approximately 80 to 100 calories per mile for the average adult.

At an average pace of around three miles per hour, most people cover a mile in about 20 minutes.

When comparing some common central London journeys, the potential savings become evident.

For instance, the journey from Covent Garden to Leicester Square, which takes around two minutes on the Tube, can be walked in about five minutes.

READ MORE:

A similar story unfolds for other short journeys:

Bank to St Paul's can be walked in eight minutes, Oxford Circus to Bond Street in seven minutes, and King's Cross to Euston in 12 minutes.

These walking times are competitive with Tube times, which often do not account for the additional time spent navigating platforms and waiting for trains.

Time Well Spent

Research by Transport for London has previously championed walking between stations for short journeys.

For example, while a Tube journey from Covent Garden to Leicester Square may take around two minutes, passengers often spend longer navigating platforms and waiting for trains.

Walking the same route takes around five minutes above ground.

Similarly, walking from Bank to Monument can take around six minutes, while many passengers spend longer transferring through the stations underground.

Annual Savings

The financial gains from opting to walk instead of taking the Tube are significant.

By substituting just two short Tube journeys per week with walking, individuals can save £5.60 per week, translating to £268.80 annually.

Increasing this to one return journey every weekday results in an annual saving of £1,344.

These figures do not even take into account the added health benefits of walking.

More Than Just Savings

Beyond the financial savings, walking also offers considerable health benefits.

According to the NHS, adults should aim for a minimum of 150 minutes of moderate-intensity activity each week.

Walking to and from work or between Tube stations can contribute towards this target without needing additional gym sessions.

A 20-minute walk each way to work would add more than three hours of physical activity per week.

Is It Worth It?

While the Tube remains the quickest option for longer journeys, for trips of one mile or less, many Londoners could save hundreds of pounds annually by opting to walk.

In some cases, the journey may only take a few minutes longer than travelling underground, especially when factoring in station queues, escalators, and waiting times.

For commuters seeking to reduce costs without significant lifestyle changes, replacing a few short Tube journeys with a walk could be a straightforward and effective solution.

Get involved
with the news

Send your news & photos